CASE AT A GLANCE
Pericardiocentesis vs. Pericardotomy
Illustrated Verdict, Inc. © All rights reserved.
Case Overview:
This case involved a patient who presented to the emergency department with pericardial effusion. The allegation was that the ED physician did not timely diagnose the cardiac tamponade and perform a pericardiocentesis. The patient had previous surgeries, esophagectomy and colectomy, which made the pericardiocentesis difficult to perform because of location of previous incisions. Ultimately a general surgeon came in and placed a pericardotomy, an incision in the pericardium to release fluid, through a right thoracotomy, which is an incision in chest wall. The jury found in favor of the defense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fca74/fca7477e78fb4e46419ffdc7b851c2c420802615" alt="5229w05.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f420e/f420ef19a087dab06ef32465919416cbb3cc0433" alt="3431w1lg.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f06b1/f06b1eac19f43439a9096206fc80eb721f36820a" alt="5447w1v2lg.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71f93/71f939a5a538e8d8523aa508d73b00ee715c260d" alt="5447w3lg.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24cea/24cea574b46e9559cb39cc52bae53966ba7b2f81" alt="5447w2lg.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d23/a6d239d01d8d82d06fe90fc48273719e6de080f6" alt="5447w4lg.jpg"